• Barrett, S. Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-Making (Oxford Univ. Press, 2003).

  • Keohane, R. O. & Victor, D. G. Cooperation and discord in global climate policy. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 570–575 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bättig, M. B. & Bernauer, T. National institutions and global public goods: are democracies more cooperative in climate change policy? Int. Organ. 63, 281–308 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Finnegan, J. J. Institutions, climate change, and the foundations of long-term policymaking. Comp. Polit. Stud. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211047416 (2022).

  • Harrison, K. & Sundstrom, L. M. in Global Commons, Domestic Decisions: The Comparative Politics of Climate Change (eds Harrison, K. & McIntosh Sundstrom, L.) 261–290 (The MIT Press, 2010).

  • Purdon, M. Advancing comparative climate change politics: theory and method. Glob. Environ. Polit. 15, 1–26 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Meckling, J. & Nahm, J. When do states disrupt industries? Electric cars and the politics of innovation. Rev. Int. Polit. Econ. 25, 505–529 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hochstetler, K. & Kostka, G. Wind and solar power in Brazil and China: interests, state–business relations, and policy outcomes. Glob. Environ. Polit. 15, 74–94 (2015).

  • Meadowcroft, J. in Comparative Environmental Politics: Theory, Practice, and Prospects (eds Steinberg, P.F. and VanDeever, S.D.) 63–88 (MIT Press, 2012).

  • Duit, A., Feindt, P. H. & Meadowcroft, J. Greening Leviathan: the rise of the environmental state? Environ. Polit. 25, 1–23 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dubash, N. K. Varieties of climate governance: the emergence and functioning of climate institutions. Environ. Polit. 30, 1–25 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dubash, N. et al. National climate institutions complement targets and policies. Science 374, 690–693 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Friedlingstein, P. et al. Global Carbon Budget 2019. Earth System Science Data 11, 1783–1838 (2019).

  • Scott, J. C. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (Yale Univ. Press, 2008).

  • Kingdon, J. W. & Stano, E. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (Little Brown, 1984).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Flachsland, C. & Levi, S. Germany’s Federal Climate Change Act. Environ. Polit. 30, 118–140 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Climate Change Laws of the World (Grantham Research Institute, accessed December 2021); https://climate-laws.org/

  • Mildenberger, M. The development of climate institutions in the United States. Environ. Polit. 30, 71–92 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Leinaweaver, J. & Thomson, R. Greener governments: partisan ideologies, executive institutions, and environmental policies. Environ. Polit. 25, 633–660 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Laird, F. N. & Stefes, C. The diverging paths of German and United States policies for renewable energy: sources of difference. Energy Policy 37, 2619–2629 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hess, D. J. & Renner, M. Conservative political parties and energy transitions in Europe: opposition to climate mitigation policies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 104, 419–428 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Coppedge, M. et al. V-Dem Dataset v11.1. (2021); https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3831905

  • Commander, S. A Guide to the Political Economy of Reforming Energy Subsidies IZA Working Paper 52 (Institute for Labor Studies, 2012).

  • Kyle, J. Local corruption and popular support for fuel subsidy reform in Indonesia. Comp. Polit. Stud. 51, 1472–1503 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Witt, M. A. et al. Mapping the business systems of 61 major economies: a taxonomy and implications for varieties of capitalism and business systems research. Socio-Econ. Rev. 16, 5–38 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lockwood, M. A hard Act to follow? The evolution and performance of UK climate governance. Environ. Polit. 30, 26–48 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hochstetler, K. Climate institutions in Brazil: three decades of building and dismantling climate capacity. Environ. Polit. 30, 49–70 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tyler, E. & Hochstetler, K. Institutionalising decarbonisation in South Africa: navigating climate mitigation and socio-economic transformation. Environ. Polit. 30, 184–205 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • The Climate Action Tracker (Climate Analytics and New Climate Institute, accessed May 2022); https://climateactiontracker.org/

  • Climate Change Performance Index (Germanwatch, accessed May 2022); https://ccpi.org/

  • Government of Iran. Iran Second National Communication to the UNFCCC (UNDP, 2010).

  • Madden, N. J. Green means stop: veto players and their impact on climate-change policy outputs. Environ. Polit. 23, 570–589 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lamb, W. F. & Minx, J. C. The political economy of national climate policy: architectures of constraint and a typology of countries. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 64, 101429 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Iversen, T. & Soskice, D. Electoral institutions and the politics of coalitions: why some democracies redistribute more than others. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 100, 165–181 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Swank, D. Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002).

  • Painter, M. & Peters, B. G. in Tradition and Public Administration (eds Painter, M. & Peters, B. G.) 19–30 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).

  • Lee, T. & Van de Meene, S. Who teaches and who learns? Policy learning through the C40 cities climate network. Policy Sci. 45, 199–220 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Friedlingstein, P. et al. Global carbon budget 2020. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 3269–3340 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Khan, M. H. Political Settlements and the Governance of Growth-Enhancing Institutions (SOAS Department of Economics, 2010).

  • Duit, A., Feindt, P. H. & Meadowcroft, J. Greening Leviathan: the rise of the environmental state? Environ. Polit. 25, 1–23 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Carhart, M., Litterman, B., Munnings, C. & Vitali, O. Measuring comprehensive carbon prices of national climate policies. Clim. Policy 22, 198–207 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • World Development Indicators (World Bank, accessed November 2021); https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators

  • Dooley, K. et al. Ethical choices behind quantifications of fair contributions under the Paris Agreement. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 300–305 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Task Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (TFI). 2019 refinement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/2019-refinement-to-the-2006-ipcc-guidelines-for-national-greenhouse-gas-inventories/ (2019).

  • Climate Policy Database (NewClimate Institute, accessed November 2021); https://climatepolicydatabase.org/

  • Visser, J. ICTWSS: Database on Institutional Characteristics of Trade Unions, Wage Setting, State Intervention and Social Pacts in 34 countries between 1960 and 2014 (Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labor Studies, 2014).

  • Henisz, V. The Political Constraint Index (POLCON) Dataset, 2017 version (Univ. Pennsylvania, 2017).



  • Source link