• 1.

    Anthoff, R. & Tol, R. The Climate Framework for Uncertainty, Negotiation and Distribution (FUND) Technical Description, Version 3.9 (Univ. of Notre Dame, 2014); https://www3.nd.edu/~nmark/Climate/Fund-3-9-Scientific-Documentation.pdf

  • 2.

    Stern, N. Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change (Her Majesty’s Treasury, 2006).

  • 3.

    Nordhaus, W. D. & Boyer, J. Warming the World: Economic Models of Global Warming (MIT Press, 2000).

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Nordhaus, W. D. Revisiting the social cost of carbon. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 1518–1523 (2017).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Tol, R. The damage costs of climate change toward more comprehensive calculations. Environ. Resour. Econ. 5, 353–374 (1995).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    Anthoff, D. & Tol, R. S. in Climate Change and Common Sense: Essays in Honour of Tom Schelling (eds Hahn, R. W. & Ulph, A.) 260–274 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2012).

  • 7.

    Hahn, R. W. & Ulph, A. in Climate Change and Common Sense: Essays in Honour of Tom Schelling (eds Hahn, R. W. & Ulph, A.) Ch. 1 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2012).

  • 8.

    Cullenward, D., Wilkerson, J. T., Wara, M. & Weyant, J. P. Dynamically estimating the distributional impacts of US climate policy with NEMS: a case study of the Climate Protection Act of 2013. Energy Econ. 55, 303–318 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Fawcett, A., McFarland, J., Morris, A. C. & Weyant, J. (eds) Special issue on EMF 32 study on US carbon tax scenarios Climate Change Econ. 9, https://www.worldscientific.com/toc/cce/09/01 (2018).

  • 10.

    Goulder, L. H. & Hafstead, M. A. Tax reform and environmental policy: options for recycling revenue from a tax on carbon dioxide. Resources for the Future https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2338210 (2013).

  • 11.

    Goulder, L. H., Hafstead, M. A., Kim, G. & Long, X. Impacts of a Carbon Tax across US Household Income Groups: What Are the Equity-Efficiency Trade-Offs? (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2018).

  • 12.

    Horowitz, J., Cronin, J.-A., Hawkins, H., Konda, L. & Yuskavage, A. Methodology for Analyzing a Carbon Tax (US Department of the Treasure, 2017).

  • 13.

    Jorgenson, D. & Goettle, R. Double Dividend: Environmental Taxes and Fiscal Reform in the United States (MIT Press, 2013).

  • 14.

    Mathur, A. & Morris, A. Distributional effects of a carbon tax in broader US fiscal reform. Energy Policy 66, 326–334 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Metcalf, G. E. Paying for Pollution: Why a Carbon Tax is Good for America (Oxford Univ. Press, 2018).

  • 16.

    Murray, B. C., Bistline, J., Creason, J., Wright, E. & Kanudia, A. The EMF 32 Study on Technology and Climate Policy Strategies for Greenhouse Gas Reductions in the US Electric Power Sector: An Overview (Elsevier, 2018).

  • 17.

    Rausch, S., Metcalf, G. E. & Reilly, J. M. Distributional impacts of carbon pricing: a general equilibrium approach with micro-data for households. Energy Econ. 33, S20–S33 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Sterner, T. Fuel Taxes and the Poor: The Distributional Effects of Gasoline Taxation and their Implications for Climate Policy (RFF Press, 2012).

  • 19.

    Klenert, D. et al. Making carbon pricing work for citizens. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 669–677 (2018).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Klenert, D., Schwerhoff, G., Edenhofer, O. & Mattauch, L. Carbon taxation, inequality and Engel’s law: the double dividend of redistribution. Environ. Resour. Econ. 71, 605–624 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Carattini, S., Kallbekken, S. & Orlov, A. How to win public support for a global carbon tax. Nature 565, 289–291 (2019).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    McCollum, D., Gomez Echeverri, L., Riahi, K. & Parkinson, S. SDG7: Ensure Access to Affordable, Reliable, Sustainable and Modern Energy for All (IIASA, 2017); http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/14621/1/SDGs-interactions-7-clean-energy.pdf

  • 23.

    Nerini, F. F. et al. Mapping synergies and trade-offs between energy and the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat. Energy 3, 10–15 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Sustainable Development Goals (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, accessed 6 May 2020); https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs

  • 25.

    Davies, J. B., Shi, X. & Whalley, J. The possibilities for global inequality and poverty reduction using revenues from global carbon pricing. J. Econ. Inequal. 12, 363–391 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Franks, M., Lessmann, K., Jakob, M., Steckel, J. C. & Edenhofer, O. Mobilizing domestic resources for the Agenda 2030 via carbon pricing. Nat. Sustain. 1, 350–357 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Nordhaus, W. D. A review of the ‘Stern review on the economics of climate change’. J. Econ. Lit. 45, 686–702 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    Stern, N. The economics of climate change. Am. Econ. Rev. 98, 1–37 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 29.

    Dorband, I. I., Jakob, M., Kalkuhl, M. & Steckel, J. C. Poverty and distributional effects of carbon pricing in low- and middle-income countries—a global comparative analysis. World Dev. 115, 246–257 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 30.

    Sterner, T. Distributional effects of taxing transport fuel. Energy Policy 41, 75–83 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 31.

    Marron, D. B. & Maag, E. How to Design Carbon Dividends (SSRN, 2018).

  • 32.

    Gardiner, S., Caney, S., Jamieson, D. & Shue, H. Climate Ethics: Essential Readings (Oxford Univ. Press, 2010).

  • 33.

    Laffer, A. B. The Laffer curve: past, present, and future. Backgrounder 1765, 1–16 (2004).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 34.

    Burke, M., Davis, W. M. & Diffenbaugh, N. S. Large potential reduction in economic damages under UN mitigation targets. Nature 557, 549–553 (2018).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 35.

    IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (WMO, 2018).

  • 36.

    Bain, P. G., Hornsey, M. J., Bongiorno, R. & Jeffries, C. Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 600–603 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 37.

    Bain, P. G. et al. Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 154–157 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 38.

    Bergquist, P., Mildenberger, M. & Stokes, L. C. Combining climate, economic, and social policy builds public support for climate action in the US. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 054019 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 39.

    Carattini, S., Carvalho, M. & Fankhauser, S. Overcoming public resistance to carbon taxes. WIREs Clim. Change 9, e531 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 40.

    Marshall, G. et al. Guide to Communicating Carbon Pricing (World Bank, 2018).

  • 41.

    Pahle, M. et al. Sequencing to ratchet up climate policy stringency. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 861–867 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 42.

    Carattini, S., Baranzini, A., Thalmann, P., Varone, F. & Vöhringer, F. Green taxes in a post-Paris world: are millions of nays inevitable? Environ. Resour. Econ. 68, 97–128 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 43.

    Budolfson, M. & Dennig, F. in Handbook on the Economics of Climate Change (eds Chichilnisky, G. et al.) 224–238 (Edward Elgar Press, 2020).

  • 44.

    Budolfson, M. et al. Utilitarian benchmarks for emissions and pledges promote equity, climate, and development. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 827–833 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 45.

    Parry, I., Black, S. & Roaf, J. Proposal for an International Carbon Price Floor Among Large Emitters (International Monetary Fund, 2021).

  • 46.

    Cronin, J. A., Fullerton, D. & Sexton, S. Vertical and horizontal redistributions from a carbon tax and rebate. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 6, S169–S208 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 47.

    Douenne, T. The vertical and horizontal distributive effects of energy taxes: a case study of a French policy. Energy J. 41, 231–253 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 48.

    Fischer, C. & Pizer, W. A. Horizontal equity effects in energy regulation. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 6, S209–S237 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 49.

    Carleton, T. et al. Valuing the Global Mortality Consequences of Climate Change Accounting for Adaptation Costs and Benefits (Univ. of Chicago, 2018).

  • 50.

    Valuing Climate Damages: Updating Estimation of the Social Cost of Carbon Dioxide (National Academies Press, 2017).

  • 51.

    Budolfson, M., Dennig, F., Fleurbaey, M., Siebert, A. & Socolow, R. H. The comparative importance for optimal climate policy of discounting, inequalities and catastrophes. Clim. Change 145, 481–494 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 52.

    Dennig, F., Budolfson, M. B., Fleurbaey, M., Siebert, A. & Socolow, R. H. Inequality, climate impacts on the future poor, and carbon prices. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15827–15832 (2015).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 53.

    Budolfson, M. et al. Climate action with revenue recycling has benefits for poverty, inequality, and wellbeing. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5552749 (2021).

  • 54.

    Nordhaus, W. D. Economic aspects of global warming in a post-Copenhagen environment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 11721–11726 (2010).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 55.

    Technical Update on the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis—Under Executive Order 12866 (Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon, United States Government, 2013).

  • 56.

    Pindyck, R. S. Climate change policy: what do the models tell us? J. Econ. Lit. 51, 860–872 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 57.

    Weyant, J. Some contributions of integrated assessment models of global climate change. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 11, 115–137 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 58.

    World Income Inequality Database (UNU-WIDER, accessed 6 May 2020); https://www.wider.unu.edu/project/wiid-world-income-inequality-database



  • Source link